Here's one of the essays I submitted that was accepted by Gaia Magazine for their first issue in Spring of 2009. Gaia is an annual publication from the Environmental Media Project at UCSC. It contains information about campus events, student action, organizations, student essays, and much more, and was devised as a means of gathering UCSC's many environmentally minded projects into one place. Great magazine by great people. I have extra copies... wink wink.
Here we go. Written January 13th, 2009 for Sarah Rabkin's Nature Literature class.
-------------------------
“Nature writers have become increasingly important to us because they struggle, in memorable language, to resolve the deep issue of this in-betweenness, a resolution crucial to the physical and spiritual survival of our world. From their own direct experiences they are aware of the limits of both objectivity and subjectivity in giving accurate accounts of nature that will grip our emotional as well as rational understanding. They pursue this understanding with an avidity for fact accessible only through the scientific method and with a passion for metaphors, patterns, feelings, and self-awareness accessible only through poetry and art. In this way, they seek to make our minds and our hearts whole again. When we look at nature, they believe, we are primarily looking at ourselves.”
Frank Stewart, A Natural History of Nature Writing (pp. xvi)
When we struggle to write about nature, something important is happening. Immersing ourselves in the company of the forest, or slowing to take in the sight of birds wheeling high among the clouds and skimming low among the spray of salt water, we often find ourselves compelled to write. Contemplations of the natural world beckon a set of unique sensations to the foreground, and despite the difficulty of describing them, we often feel the urge to do so. I feel that I will never overcome the struggle to describe exactly what happens to me in these familiar and precious moments.
I have often tried to write objectively. A description of the time and place, or of the activity of the wildlife, is sufficient to begin with. I find that, by using my senses to absorb the patterns of nature, I may slow the anxious churning engine of my mind, and anchor myself to the present moment. The value of this meditation cannot be overstated, and yet it consistently proves insufficient at relieving my desire to approach the deeper truths that live within the moving mosaic of the natural world.
By abandoning my attempts at objective observation, I have progressed further still. My journals hold pages that describe the shifting sphere of solitude that a tree canopy provides to one who perches in its highest terraces. I have attempted to depict the illusion of a gently rolling ocean, as a breeze sweeps across a field of tall and wild grasses, the sun setting upon the horizon. Looking outwards during daytime, or upwards during the night, I have slowly learned to let my words drip themselves onto the pages, and relinquished the urge to be aware of what I am writing. Playing with poetic language has produced a thicker journal than I may have had otherwise. I am, however, consistently faced by the challenge to describe what has happened to me, rather than around me. This is where I still struggle today. This is where, in writing about nature, I have encountered myself.
I am certain that this task is so insistent in my mind because it is the one area of both nature and myself that I have not, and perhaps cannot, make permanent with pen and paper. It is, not coincidentally, the place where nature and myself lay upon one another, be it on the fields of earth, or in the wild thought-swept planes of my own imagination. To describe what happens to me is simple; I experience my relationship with nature. I have, however, experienced this in a myriad of ways: by working in the garden with my father while a boy, by being caught outside in a rainstorm, or even by reading the words of others who have pursued a similar aspiration. Those are all facets of my relationship with the natural world.
It is in pursuing the source of this relationship that I struggle. It is in chasing the wilderness within myself, that I falter. I can find root in the whirling of the sun and moon across the heavens, or the birth and death of the fields and flowers. I find it easy to take comfort in the lawful permanence of nature’s motion; I find difficult to attempt the same permanence with words. It may be for the better. If it is as Abbey suggests in Desert Solitaire that, by seeking to name the things we find in nature, “the world remains…and it is we who are lost”, I am grateful that this mystery should remain elusive. To let the wilderness be wild may be the only way to ever do it justice.